logo
Racklify LogoJoin for Free
Login

Choosing Between Polypropylene and Polyester Synthetic Facestock

Synthetic Facestock (Polypropylene/Polyester)

Updated October 7, 2025

ERWIN RICHMOND ECHON

Definition

Comparing polypropylene (BOPP) and polyester (BOPET) synthetic facestock helps you select the right film for durability, clarity, temperature tolerance, and cost for specific label applications.

Overview

When evaluating Synthetic Facestock (Polypropylene/Polyester), the decision often comes down to two widely used film types: polypropylene (BOPP) and polyester (BOPET). Each has strengths and trade-offs, and choosing the best one depends on the application environment, printing process, budget, and regulatory or sustainability goals. This article explains the differences in plain language and offers practical guidance for selecting the right facestock for your labels.


Start by visualizing the primary differences:


  • Polypropylene (BOPP): Lightweight, cost-effective, moisture-resistant, and available in many finishes and clarity options. Common for food and beverage labels, shrink sleeves, and many consumer products.
  • Polyester (BOPET): Stronger, more heat- and chemical-resistant, and highly dimensionally stable. Preferred for asset tags, outdoor labels, chemical containers, and long-term identification needs.


Key selection criteria and how each film compares


  • Durability: Polyester generally outperforms polypropylene in tear resistance and abrasion resistance. If labels are exposed to heavy handling, abrasive environments, or long-term outdoor exposure, BOPET is often the safer choice.
  • Temperature resistance: BOPET tolerates higher temperatures—useful for industrial labels exposed to heat, hot fill processes, or autoclave-like conditions. BOPP performs well in typical refrigerated and ambient conditions but has lower heat tolerance.
  • Chemical resistance: Polyester resists many solvents and oils better than BOPP. For chemical drums, solvent containers, and harsh-cleaning environments, BOPET is usually preferred.
  • Flexibility and conformability: BOPP can be more conformable and cost-effective for labels that wrap tight curves or irregular containers. For extreme conformability, there are specialized polypropylene films engineered for shrink or stretch applications.
  • Clarity and gloss: Both films offer clear and white versions. Clear BOPP often provides an excellent “no-label look” with good gloss, while clear polyester can give sharper, glossier, and more dimensionally stable results.
  • Printability: Both perform well when treated properly. Select the right surface treatment (e.g., corona-treated or primer-coated) for your printing method—thermal transfer, flexo, digital inkjet, or UV ink systems.
  • Cost: Generally, BOPP is less expensive than BOPET. If cost sensitivity is high and environmental exposure moderate, BOPP can be a practical choice.
  • Recyclability and sustainability: Recyclability varies by region and local programs. Mono-polymer BOPP constructions (film face + compatible adhesive & liner) may be recyclable in some facilities. Polyester is a different polymer and recycling paths differ. Ask suppliers for recyclable or certified-sustainable options if this matters.


Recommended applications by film type (real-world examples)


  • BOPP (Polypropylene): Grocery product labels (sauces, juices, bottles), refrigerated goods, cosmetic labels, flexible packaging overlays, and promotional labels where cost and moisture resistance are key.
  • BOPET (Polyester): Asset tags, industrial equipment labels, outdoor safety & instruction labels, chemical drums, long-life barcode labels, and any application needing high temperature or solvent resistance.


Additional practical tips to choose confidently


  • Match environment to film: Evaluate exposure to moisture, temperature swings, chemicals, and abrasion. That environment often dictates the safe ground for film choice.
  • Consider finishing and overlamination: A BOPP face with a protective overlaminate can extend durability, and a BOPET face with a matte varnish may reduce glare—these finishing choices can bridge the gap between cost and performance.
  • Test with your printing process: Printability differs by press and ink chemistry. Request supplier samples and conduct trial runs to validate color, adhesion, and curing before full production.
  • Adhesive selection matters more than you might think: The right acrylic or rubber adhesive engineered for film surfaces prevents edge lift and failure. Use adhesives rated for low-energy or treated films as appropriate.
  • Think long-term total cost: A cheaper face film that fails in the field may cost more overall due to replacements, recalls, or damaged goods. Balance upfront film cost with performance risks.


In practice, many label converters and brand teams keep both films on spec for different SKUs: BOPP for everyday consumer items and BOPET for specialized industrial or outdoor SKUs. This dual approach allows cost optimization while maintaining performance for demanding products.


Finally, engage suppliers early: modern film manufacturers often provide technical support, sample kits, and performance data. Discuss your exact application—substrate, container shape, filling process, storage conditions, and expected life—so they can recommend BOPP or BOPET variants best suited for your needs.


Choosing between polypropylene and polyester for Synthetic Facestock (Polypropylene/Polyester) comes down to balancing environment, durability, print needs, and budget. With practical testing and supplier consultation, you can confidently specify the right film for consistent, attractive, and reliable labels.

Tags
BOPP vs BOPET
synthetic facestock
label selection
Related Terms

No related terms available

Racklify Logo

Processing Request