LTL vs. FTL (Full Truckload): Choosing the right shipping method for your business

Choosing between Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) and Full Truckload (FTL) shipping is a fundamental logistics decision that affects cost, transit time, product handling, and overall supply chain efficiency. Both modes move freight by truck, but they differ in how space is purchased, how shipments are handled, and the types of businesses that benefit most from each. This entry explains the operational differences, financial trade-offs, situational considerations, and practical steps to decide which method best fits a business's needs.

Core definitions and how each mode works

FTL (Full Truckload): A single shipper hires an entire truck for a single shipment. The trailer is loaded at origin and delivered directly to the consignee or to a single drop-off point, minimizing handling and intermediate stops.

LTL (Less-Than-Truckload): Multiple shippers' pallets or packages share space in a single trailer. Freight is consolidated at origin terminals and deconsolidated at intermediate terminals before final delivery, which results in multiple handling events and potential stops along the route.

Key differences that drive the decision

• Cost structure: LTL pricing is generally charged per pallet or hundredweight (CWT) with additional accessorial fees; FTL is typically a flat rate for the entire trailer, driven by distance and equipment type. For smaller shipments, LTL is usually more cost-effective; for larger loads that approach full-truck capacity, FTL offers better per-unit cost.
• Transit time and reliability: FTL often delivers faster because it goes direct, whereas LTL can have longer and less predictable transit times due to consolidation and terminal stops.
• Handling and risk: LTL involves more loading/unloading and transfers, increasing the risk of damage or loss. FTL reduces handling points and is typically better for fragile, high-value, or time-sensitive goods.
• Capacity and volume: If your shipment fills most of a trailer or exceeds a carrier's LTL maximum (often measured in linear feet or pallet count), FTL is appropriate. Small, irregular, or infrequent shipments fit LTL.
• Flexibility and schedule: FTL gives you control over pickup and delivery timing. LTL follows carrier schedules for consolidation and terminal routing.

When to choose LTL

• Your shipment volume is small (typically under 10-12 pallets, depending on trailer type) and doesn’t justify a full trailer.
• Cost sensitivity outweighs speed or direct transit—LTL can be significantly cheaper for small loads.
• You have consolidated, non-urgent replenishment moves or multiple deliveries to different customers along a route that match LTL routing.
• You need frequent, lower-cost shipments rather than waiting to accumulate a full truckload.

When to choose FTL

• Your shipment approaches or exceeds the capacity of an LTL load (e.g., large pallet counts, high cube or heavy shipments).
• You ship high-value, fragile, or hazardous materials that benefit from reduced handling and direct routing.
• Time-sensitive deliveries where faster transit and guaranteed direct routes matter.
• Broker or contract commitments where control over pickup and delivery windows is required.

Practical decision factors and examples

Consider a business shipping 8 pallets each week to a regional retailer. If each pallet is standard size and not overweight, LTL may be cheaper because the load is within typical LTL limits and the retailer tolerates longer transit. Conversely, a manufacturer shipping 18 pallets of finished goods to a single location will likely choose FTL: that shipment occupies most of a trailer, giving a better per-pallet rate and direct transit.

Another example: a distributor of delicate electronics will prefer FTL for fragile, high-value shipments to reduce handling even if cost is slightly higher. A small e-commerce merchant with varied customers and frequent small shipments will lean on LTL or parcel networks to match volume and budget.

Cost components to evaluate

• Base freight rate (distance, fuel, lane demand).
• Accessorial charges (liftgate, inside delivery, residential delivery, reconsignment, detention, pallet exchange).
• Minimum charges and guarantees; LTL often has minimum weights or pricing thresholds.
• Insurance and declared value fees; FTL may have lower relative insurance cost per unit because of fewer handling events.
• Dimensional pricing impacts (especially for LTL where density matters).
• 
  

Best practices when choosing between LTL and FTL

1. Analyze historical shipment data: volume, pallet counts, weight, and destinations. Identify lanes where frequent LTL shipments could be consolidated into less frequent FTL moves.
2. Run cost comparisons that include accessorials and potential damage costs. Use total landed cost—freight plus handling, returns, and claims—to compare modes.
3. Negotiate with carriers: contract rates for frequent lanes can change the economics. Consider volume commitments in exchange for lower FTL or LTL rates.
4. Consider hybrid strategies: combine LTL for small customers and FTL for bulk replenishment to regional hubs, then use local distribution networks.
5. Use technology: transportation management systems (TMS) can model scenarios, compare multimodal options, and automate carrier selection.

Common mistakes to avoid

• Choosing purely on headline per-pallet costs without factoring accessorials, transit time penalties, or damage risk.
• Failing to account for seasonal lane variability—what’s economical in off-peak months may not hold during peak seasons.
• Ignoring service requirements: fast-moving retail replenishment may require the reliability of FTL despite higher nominal cost.
• Not considering consolidation opportunities: multiple LTL shipments to the same region can sometimes be consolidated into FTL to reduce total cost.

Conclusion



The right choice between LTL and FTL depends on a balanced assessment of volume, cost, speed, product value, and handling tolerance. Use data to identify which lanes are best served by each mode, negotiate contracts for predictable lanes, and employ a TMS or freight broker to optimize decisions. In many operations, a hybrid approach—FTL for bulk replenishment and LTL for smaller customer shipments—delivers the best mix of cost efficiency and service reliability.