Why Choose Interleaved 2 of 5 (ITF)? Benefits, Limitations and Best Practices
Interleaved 2 of 5 (ITF)
Updated December 12, 2025
ERWIN RICHMOND ECHON
Definition
Interleaved 2 of 5 (ITF) is chosen for its compact numeric encoding and robustness on corrugated packaging; it’s ideal for carton-level barcodes in logistics but limited by numeric-only encoding and sensitivity to very poor print quality.
Overview
When choosing a barcode symbology for packaging and logistics, you’ll often weigh trade-offs between data capacity, printability, cost, and scanning reliability. Interleaved 2 of 5 (ITF) is a pragmatic choice in many supply chain scenarios. This beginner-friendly explanation explores why organizations pick ITF, what advantages it offers, key limitations, and practical best practices for successful use.
Core reasons organizations choose ITF
- Designed for carton-level labeling: ITF naturally fits outer-case and master-carton environments. It’s optimized for the kinds of surfaces and printing methods used on corrugated boxes.
- Numeric density: ITF encodes digits in pairs by interleaving bar and space patterns, delivering a compact representation for numeric data. This saves space on a carton face compared to some other linear symbologies when encoding many digits.
- Robust under lower print quality: Compared with very narrow high-resolution barcodes, ITF is more tolerant of slight smudging or rough textures, which are common when printing directly on cardboard or using lower-cost thermal transfer ribbons.
Practical benefits explained
- Cost-effectiveness: ITF labels are inexpensive to produce and can be printed using standard case printers and label applicators without special inks or materials.
- Compatibility with systems: WMS, TMS, and label-design software generally support ITF generation and decoding, so integration effort is usually low.
- Industry adoption: ITF-14 for GTIN-14 is widely recognized in distribution networks, making ITF a safe choice for supplier-retailer compliance when outer-case GTINs are required.
Limitations and when ITF is not the right fit
- Numeric-only: ITF supports only digits 0–9. If you need to encode alphanumeric strings (e.g., part numbers with letters), choose another symbology such as Code 128.
- No built-in structured application identifiers: If you need to include multiple data elements (batch, expiry, serial) with explicit semantics, GS1-128 or 2D barcodes are better suited.
- Dependence on print contrast: While tolerant of rough surfaces, extremely poor contrast or crushed corrugate can still cause read failures. Proper printing and label placement are essential.
Best practices for using ITF successfully
- Design for placement: Place ITF on the largest flat face of the carton, away from corners, seams, and tape. Provide sufficient quiet zones around the code.
- Specify minimum size: Adhere to minimum symbol width and height recommendations. If your print area is too small, consider switching to a 2D code.
- Test with real materials: Validate print settings and scanner read rates using the actual corrugated board, inks, printers, and label applicators used in production.
- Coordinate with partners: Confirm format expectations with customers and carriers. For example, if they expect an ITF-14 encoding of the GTIN, ensure your encoded number and any required check digit match their rules.
- Monitor scanning performance: During rollout, track read rates at receiving docks and sortation points. Use those metrics to adjust print quality, placement, and operator training.
Comparison with alternatives
Consider these trade-offs when evaluating ITF against other symbologies:
- Code 128: Better for mixed alphanumeric data and variable-length identifiers, but may require higher print quality for very dense encodings.
- GS1-128: Ideal for structured GS1 data with application identifiers (GGN, batch, expiry), but more complex to implement correctly.
- 2D codes (QR, Data Matrix): Offer much higher data density and error correction; good for tiny labels or when multiple data elements are needed, but require compatible scanner infrastructure.
Real-world decision example
A contract packaging company produces thousands of corrugated cases daily for multiple brands. The clients require simple case identifiers (GTIN-14) and fast scanning on receiving. The packager selects ITF-14 because it is compact, prints reliably on corrugated material using existing case printers, and integrates easily into the WMS. They validate production through test runs and establish label placement standards to maintain read rates above 99%.
Practical checklist before adopting ITF
- Confirm that your identifiers are numeric-only or that you will encode a numeric GTIN-14 for carton IDs.
- Verify printer capability and ribbon/ink compatibility with corrugated substrates.
- Run a scan-test across the actual supply chain touchpoints (packing, transit, receiving).
- Document label placement, minimum size, and quiet zone requirements for operators and vendors.
Summary
Organizations choose Interleaved 2 of 5 for carton-level barcoding because it balances density, cost, and robustness on corrugated materials. It’s especially useful for GTIN-14 and other numeric identifiers. However, it is limited to numeric data and may not suit use cases requiring structured multi-element data or alphanumeric codes. Following best practices for size, placement, and testing helps ensure reliable performance in the supply chain.
Related Terms
No related terms available
