Trump Ends De Minimis Trade Loophole for Global Low-Value Shipments
President Trump signed an executive order ending the longstanding de minimis exemption for low-value imports into the U.S., effective August 29, 2025. The order eliminates duty-free treatment for shipments valued at $800 or less from all countries, citing concerns over trade imbalances, national security, and the abuse of loopholes by platforms like Temu and Shein. Third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and e-commerce sellers now face new compliance obligations, including tariffs, customs declarations, and potential restructuring of their fulfillment models. The move marks a seismic shift in global e-commerce logistics, with immediate consequences for small importers and large marketplaces alike.

William Carlin
31 Jul 2025 3:55 PM

President Trump Shuts Down Customs Loophole
President Donald Trump has moved to shut down a major customs loophole that allowed low-value imports to enter the United States duty-free. On Wednesday (July 30, 2025), Trump signed an executive order ending the “de minimis” trade exemption for packages valued at $800 or less from all countries. Starting August 29, every imported shipment – regardless of value – will be subject to U.S. duties and taxes, eliminating the tariff-free status that small parcels have enjoyed for years. This decisive action, touted by the White House as closing a “catastrophic loophole,” carries significant implications for third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and e-commerce sellers worldwide.
A cargo ship unloading containers at the Port of Oakland in California. Under the new rules, even low-value parcels in those containers will no longer be exempt from U.S. tariffs.
What is the De Minimis Loophole?
The de minimis provision refers to a longstanding U.S. policy that exempts low-value shipments from import duties and burdensome customs procedures. Section 321 of the Tariff Act allows informal entry of goods (with minimal paperwork) valued at or below a certain threshold per day, per importer. In 2016, the U.S. raised this de minimis threshold to $800 – one of the world’s most generous limits. The original intent was to streamline trade by sparing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) the effort of assessing trivial duties on inexpensive purchases. For example, an American tourist could bring back souvenirs under $200 duty-free, or an individual could receive a gift under $100 without tariffs (those personal exemptions remain unchanged under the new order)
However, in the e-commerce era this well-meaning policy evolved into a “trade loophole”. It enabled foreign retailers to ship goods directly to U.S. consumers’ doorsteps in small parcels, avoiding tariffs and complex import formalities. Companies worldwide – especially China’s ultra-cheap retail platforms like Shein and Temu – systematically exploited de minimis to sell products at rock-bottom prices with minimal overhead. Rather than bulk shipping into U.S. warehouses, these sellers broke up orders into many small packages sent via international mail or courier, each flying under the $800 radar to reach buyers duty-free. This strategy made global online shopping cheaper and more convenient, but increasingly came under fire from U.S. manufacturers and policymakers as unfair competition.
Why End the De Minimis Exemption?
The Trump Administration has framed the de minimis influx as a serious threat to national security, consumer safety, and American industry. In a White House fact sheet, officials described the exemption as a “catastrophic loophole” used to “evade tariffs and funnel deadly synthetic opioids as well as other unsafe or below-market products” into the country. Because de minimis packages clear customs with less scrutiny than regular shipments, smugglers have taken advantage of them to ship fentanyl, narcotics precursors, counterfeit goods, and other illicit items that might slip past inspections. In FY2024, fully 90% of all cargo seizures by CBP were from de minimis shipments, including 98% of narcotics cases and 97% of intercepted counterfeit items. U.S. officials argue that this “big scam” hurts American lives and businesses, enabling a flood of unregulated products from abroad.
Economic motives are also at play. Trump has promised to protect U.S. manufacturers and workers by closing loopholes that give foreign sellers a price edge. Senator Jim Banks praised the de minimis crackdown, saying “for too long, countries like China have flooded our markets with duty-free, cheap imports.”. Additionally, Trump cited the exploding U.S. trade deficit as a justification: in April, he declared a national emergency over trade imbalances, arguing that rampant duty-free imports undermine domestic industry and U.S. economic security. All these concerns culminated in the decision to slam the door on de minimis shipments worldwide.
Explosion of Low-Value Shipments
The use of de minimis has skyrocketed alongside the e-commerce boom. CBP now processes over 4 million de minimis parcels every day entering the U.S. Annual volume ballooned from about 134 million shipments in 2015 to over 1.36 billion by 2024, according to White House data. This surge was fueled largely by direct-to-consumer sales from Asia. In fact, 55% of all goods (by weight) shipped by air from China to the U.S. last year were low-value e-commerce parcels, up from just 5% in 2018. Platforms like Shein and Temu built entire supply chains around fast, cheap parcel delivery, sending huge numbers of individual packages rather than bulk freight.
The sheer volume has become unmanageable for authorities. CBP acknowledges the "explosion of de minimis shipments has outstripped its ability” to check for trade violations and contraband. The White House noted that even countries “historically not primary sources of de minimis abuse” have seen **their package volumes skyrocket in 2025, with 309 million low-value shipments recorded so far this fiscal year (through June 30) versus 115 million in all of FY2024. This suggests that after China’s de minimis access was cut off in May, sellers may have re-routed shipments through other countries, turning the loophole into a global game of whack-a-mole. Each duty-free package also represents lost tariff revenue: the White House stressed the current situation results in “significant lost revenue” for the U.S. Treasury.
Closing the Loophole: Trump’s Executive Order
Facing these trends, President Trump opted for immediate action. The new Executive Order on “Suspending Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries” was signed on July 30, 2025, and takes effect August 29, 2025. Key provisions include:
- Universal Duty on Imports ≤ $800: The $800 de minimis duty exemption is eliminated for all countries. Any commercial shipment entering the U.S., regardless of value, must pay “all applicable duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges” as if there were no de minimis rule. In practice, this means importers of goods $800 or under will now be charged the same tariff rates that apply to higher-value imports from that country. For example, a $50 gadget from abroad will no longer slip in duty-free; it will face normal tariffs (e.g. MFN tariff, any Section 301 China tariff if applicable, etc.) just like a large shipment would.
- Different Treatment for Postal Packages: One temporary carve-out is for items coming via the international postal system (national mail services). Recognizing the complexity of screening and valuing millions of small mail packets, the order imposes a simplified flat duty on postal shipments for now. Postal parcels will incur either an “ad valorem” duty (a percentage of the item’s value equal to the tariff rate for its country of origin) or a fixed fee per package between $80 and $200 depending on the origin country’s tariff category. This specific flat fee option lasts six months; after that, postal shipments too must pay the full ad valorem tariffs. In short, mail packages get a short grace period of simplified tariffs, whereas private courier shipments (UPS, FedEx, DHL, etc.) will immediately require full customs entries and duties on Aug. 29.
- Formal Entry Requirements: Under the order, all low-value shipments (except postal) must be entered through CBP’s systems with an appropriate customs entry filing. Previously, couriers could clear Section 321 packages with minimal data. Now, importers or their brokers will have to file documentation (likely an “informal” or even formal entry in the Automated Commercial Environment) and may need to post customs bonds for shipments that used to be exempt. CBP is authorized to adjust regulations and require bonds on shipments $2,500 or below to ensure duties get paid. This means more paperwork and compliance steps for anyone importing low-value goods.
- Effective Date and Legal Basis: The changes kick in at 12:01 a.m. EDT on August 29, 2025, giving businesses just 30 days to adjust. Notably, Trump is invoking emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and citing ongoing national emergencies (fentanyl trafficking, border security, trade deficits) as authority. This approach allows him to bypass the normal legislative process and implement the policy immediately, rather than waiting for a recently passed law to take effect in 2027.
Trump’s move actually goes beyond congressional action. Earlier this month, a large tax-and-spending bill dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law, which will repeal the de minimis statute globally as of July 1, 2027. Rather than wait two years, Trump has leveraged his executive authority to suspend the exemption “more quickly than the OBBBA requires, to deal with national emergencies and save American lives and businesses now,” the White House stated. In effect, the emergency order accelerates a change that was already on the horizon, but with an immediate impact on current trade flows.
Recent Crackdown on China and Legal Challenges
This global de minimis ban follows a targeted crackdown on China and Hong Kong earlier this year. Effective May 2, 2025, the administration revoked de minimis privileges for shipments originating from China or Hong Kong, which historically accounted for the bulk of de minimis packages to the U.S.. Chinese e-commerce giants were hit hard: retailers like Shein and Temu could no longer send cheap direct parcels from China duty-free, forcing them to pivot their strategies. According to reports, Temu halted direct shipments from China to U.S. customers and scrambled to fulfill orders from its U.S.-based warehouses once the rule changed. Both Temu and Shein also had to raise prices on many products to account for new tariffs they suddenly had to pay. This foreshadows the adjustments e-commerce sellers in other countries may need to make now that the exemption is ending worldwide.
Unsurprisingly, the China/HK ban prompted legal pushback from importers. In May, a small auto parts retailer in Michigan (Axle of Dearborn, Inc.) sued the administration, arguing that eliminating the de minimis allowance by executive fiat was unlawful and devastating to its business. The company claimed it would be hit with a cascade of tariffs – from 25% Section 301 China duties to new IEEPA tariffs as high as 145% – on auto parts it had been importing duty-free. It sought a court injunction to block the policy, contending that only Congress can modify the Tariff Act’s de minimis provision and that the rule change failed to consider the harm to small businesses.
However, the U.S. Court of International Trade declined to pause Trump’s de minimis ban. Earlier this week, the trade court allowed the China-focused order to remain in effect while litigation continues. In other words, no relief was granted to importers like Axle of Dearborn, meaning the policy stands and those shipments are being taxed. This legal battle is ongoing (as part of a broader wave of lawsuits challenging Trump’s tariff maneuvers), but so far the administration’s actions have not been overturned. The outcome signals that, at least for now, businesses must comply with the new rules while courts weigh the executive authority under IEEPA versus the statutory de minimis law
Impacts on E-Commerce Sellers
For e-commerce companies, both large and small, the end of de minimis is truly a game-changer. Many online sellers have built their business models around the ability to ship inexpensive products directly from overseas factories to U.S. customers with negligible import costs. Now, every cross-border sale will face tariffs and customs compliance, which could raise prices and complicate logistics for direct-to-consumer fulfillment.
Some of the biggest users of de minimis, like Shein and Temu, have already felt the pain from the China ban. These platforms thrived by listing ultra-low-cost apparel, accessories, and home goods shipped individually from Chinese warehouses to American buyers. When their duty-free pipeline was cut off, they had to quickly adapt by utilizing U.S. distribution centers and adjusting prices. This suggests that other foreign retailers will now need to implement similar strategies: for example, European or Asian brands that sold to Americans via direct international mail may consider warehousing inventory in the U.S. or partnering with domestic fulfillment services to avoid individual export shipments. In the short term, logistics experts predict a scramble to beat the deadline. “Expect a bunch of sales as brands try to liquidate their overseas inventory in the next 30 days,” advised Aaron Rubin, CEO of ShipHero, noting that many sellers will rush to import goods before the duties kick in. 3PLs facilitating cross-border e-commerce might see a surge of inbound stock transfers this month as merchants advance shipments to get under the wire.
Small businesses are particularly vulnerable. Niche e-commerce sellers on platforms like Etsy, eBay, or Amazon Marketplace often rely on suppliers abroad or run their own overseas operations to drop-ship to customers. The de minimis rule allowed even one-person shops to sell internationally without dealing with customs bureaucracy on each order. After August 29, these entrepreneurs face new hurdles: every sale to a U.S. buyer could require a customs declaration and duty payment. If they fail to prepare, packages could be held until duties are paid or even returned. Many such micro-importers are unfamiliar with customs procedures, so the added friction and cost could deter international sales or cut into already thin profit margins Sellers will need to decide whether to raise prices (to cover duties), absorb the costs, or limit sales to domestic inventory. Some may choose to withdraw from the U.S. market if compliance proves too onerous.
Even large retailers like Amazon are not immune. Amazon’s third-party marketplace hosts millions of overseas sellers, some of whom shipped products directly to U.S. consumers through Amazon’s “international” listings. Moreover, Amazon operates a low-cost shopping service called “Haul” that offers Chinese goods to U.S. shoppers. All of those transactions will now incur tariffs. Amazon’s stock price dipped on the announcement, reflecting investor concern that higher costs and potential disruption of its cross-border marketplace could impact sales. Similarly, PDD Holdings (parent of Temu) saw its shares fall on fears that its value proposition of ultra-cheap goods would be eroded once tariffs apply (Temu’s entire model of shipping direct-from-China was essentially predicated on de minimis duty avoidance).
On the flip side, U.S. brick-and-mortar retailers and brands that compete with low-cost imports could gain some relief. If Shein’s T-shirts or Temu’s gadgets become pricier due to tariffs, American-made or American-stocked goods might become more competitive on price. Domestic manufacturers, especially in sectors like textiles, apparel, and consumer goods, have applauded the move. Kim Glas, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations, stated that de minimis had “functioned as a black box for low-cost, subsidized, and unethical Chinese imports” undermining U.S. industry, and praised the closure of the loophole as a “game changer” for American workers. E-commerce sellers who source or produce their products within the U.S. (or import in bulk and pay duties properly) may also find a more level playing field now.
Impacts on 3PLs and Logistics Providers
For logistics companies, the end of de minimis will reshape cross-border parcel flows. International 3PLs, freight forwarders, and express couriers have benefited from the boom in small-package shipments. Now, there could be a decline in direct-to-consumer parcels from overseas, as many such orders may either cease or be consolidated. A notable drop in air cargo volume out of Asia is already observable: after the China de minimis ban in May, air cargo shipments from Asia to the U.S. fell by about 10.7%. Cargo airlines and mail transport operators that were lifting planeloads of e-commerce parcels might see reduced demand, at least in the near term.
However, a shift in supply chain patterns could create new opportunities for 3PLs:
- Warehousing and Fulfillment: As mentioned, more sellers may store inventory in U.S. warehouses to fulfill orders domestically. This could increase demand for 3PL warehousing, inventory management, and fulfillment services stateside. Companies that previously acted simply as cross-border intermediaries might expand into offering “import, stock, and ship” solutions for foreign sellers navigating the change.
- Customs Brokerage Services: With millions of shipments that used to bypass formal customs now requiring entry filings, there will be a surge in demand for customs brokerage and compliance assistance. 3PLs with customs expertise (or brokers themselves) can assist e-commerce importers in filing the necessary documents, classifying products, and calculating duties for countless low-value items. This is an administrative burden that many small importers can’t handle alone, so they will look to logistics providers for help.
- Technology and Automation: To handle the volume, logistics firms may need to deploy new IT solutions – for example, integrating automated duty calculation and payment systems at checkout for e-commerce (so that duties are prepaid) or leveraging section 321 data filing tools in new ways. The next 30 days are likely to see 3PLs and carriers upgrading their systems to collect and remit duties as required. Indeed, the executive order explicitly makes carriers responsible for collecting and remitting duties on postal shipments to CBP. This means postal consolidators and services like ePacket will need processes to calculate the flat $80-$200 fees and ensure payment to U.S. customs. Carriers may need to notify customers of COD charges or require prepayment of estimated tariffs before delivery, adding new steps to last-mile delivery.
- Bond Requirements: The order’s requirement for import bonds on what were formerly informal entries could affect courier networks and 3PLs too. Carriers will need to have sufficient international carrier bonds and may require clients to have bonds or use the carrier’s bond to secure compliance. Managing these financial guarantees is another area where logistics providers will need to adjust.
In sum, while some logistics segments (cross-border parcel shipping) may see a downturn, others (warehousing, customs services) may see an uptick. 3PLs that can quickly pivot to support import compliance and domestic distribution for e-commerce sellers will be in high demand. Those that specialized only in funneling overseas direct shipments might struggle unless they adapt.
Industry Reaction and Outlook
Reactions to Trump’s sweeping move have been sharply divided along the lines of manufacturers vs. import-reliant sellers. U.S. manufacturing groups and labor advocates have generally cheered the closure of the de minimis loophole. They view it as restoring fairness: domestic producers have long paid tariffs on raw materials and faced higher costs, while some foreign competitors enjoyed duty-free entry by shipping under the threshold. The immediate applause from organizations like the National Council of Textile Organizations underscores a belief that this will crack down on what Trump has called a “big scam” in trade. Proponents also highlight potential consumer safety benefits – fewer uninspected packages might mean less counterfeits and recalled goods slipping through. Some lawmakers in Congress have been pushing for de minimis reform as well, concerned that Chinese firms especially were exploiting it to skirt tariffs and flood the market.
On the other hand, retailers and trade groups representing importers have expressed concern. The abrupt timeline and global scope mean virtually no country is exempt (even close U.S. trading partners like Canada, Mexico, and EU nations will lose the exemption for their parcels). Small and medium enterprises that rely on imported components or products warn of increased costs and supply chain disruptions, which could ultimately mean higher prices for consumers. The auto parts seller’s lawsuit reflects a broader anxiety among businesses that rapid policy changes make planning difficult and could put some companies out of business. Major retail importers have yet to publicly comment on this specific move, but many companies are likely assessing how it will affect their e-commerce operations.
Trade partners overseas may also view this as a protectionist measure. It effectively acts as a new tariff barrier on low-priced goods. Some countries could retaliate or complain through trade channels, though the U.S. maintains it is an internal policy tied to emergencies (like drug interdiction) and not a typical tariff war action. There is also an element of ongoing negotiation: The Trump administration has been pressing allies to accept new trade deals (for example, it secured a tentative agreement with the EU to impose a 15% reciprocal tariff on its exports. By ending de minimis early, the U.S. might be using it as leverage in trade talks, signaling that no concession will be given on small packages in future agreements. Many nations had grown accustomed to the U.S.’s high $800 threshold – now they must adjust to their exporters facing duties on even $5 or $10 items sent to America.
For now, the policy is set and the clock is ticking toward August 29. Unless court challenges prevail (which appears unlikely in the short term), businesses have to comply. The long-term outcome will depend on how consumers and companies respond. Will American shoppers buy less from overseas sellers if prices rise? Will foreign e-commerce players invest in U.S. warehouses or find creative ways to maintain fast, cheap shipping? Will the volume of international small parcels dip significantly, or will it continue albeit with duties added (generating a revenue windfall for the government)?
Preparing for the Change: Advice for 3PLs and Sellers
With only a few weeks before the new rules take effect, here are key steps and considerations for 3PLs and e-commerce sellers:
- Educate and Communicate: If you’re a seller shipping from overseas, inform your customers about potential changes. Unexpected COD duty bills at delivery could anger buyers, so set clear expectations or charge duties at checkout. 3PLs should proactively notify their clients of the new requirements and assist them in understanding the implications.
- Accelerate Shipments Before Deadline: As noted, some sellers are rushing to send inventory into the U.S. before August 29. Work closely with your logistics partners if you plan to advance shipments – capacity might be strained as many try to do the same. Ensure documentation is in order, because volumes could spike right before the cutoff.
- Consider U.S. Warehousing: It may be time to transition to a domestic fulfillment model. Storing goods in the U.S. (whether in your own facility or with a 3PL) and shipping to U.S. customers from there can avoid the need for each order to clear international customs. This comes with warehousing costs, but it might be more efficient than paying duties and facing delays on every single package.
- Register as Importer and Get Compliant: If you will continue shipping internationally to the U.S., obtain an Importer of Record number (IRS/EIN) if you don’t have one, and be prepared to file customs entries. For small sellers who have never done this, using a customs broker or a parcel service that offers broker-inclusive delivery will be essential. Carriers like DHL/UPS may roll the new duty process into their service (for a fee), so inquire about “duties-paid” solutions.
- Update Pricing and Strategy: Recalculate your product costs with applicable U.S. tariffs included. Some items (e.g. apparel from China) could face 30% or more in duties. Decide if you will raise prices for U.S. buyers or absorb some costs. If certain low-margin products no longer make sense to sell into the U.S., shift focus to other products or markets. In some cases, consolidating shipments (e.g. sending one bulk shipment to yourself in the U.S. and then distributing) might reduce overall costs versus many individual shipments.
- Strengthen Compliance to Avoid Penalties: CBP will likely increase enforcement now that all packages are dutiable. Ensure accurate documentation accompanies shipments – no undervaluing invoices or misclassifying goods to sneak under thresholds (that game is over, and penalties could be severe). Also pay attention to other regulations: items previously excused from scrutiny might now draw inspection, so comply with FDA, CPSC, or other agency rules for your products.
- Monitor Policy Updates: The situation is dynamic. CBP will be issuing implementation guidelines, possibly in the Federal Register, especially regarding the postal shipment process and any new electronic systems for low-value entries. Stay tuned for these details. Additionally, if any legal injunctions or changes occur, be ready to adjust plans. For instance, if a court later rules on the legality of the IEEPA tariffs, it could alter the landscape (though at this point planning for the new regime is prudent).
Shift In US Trade Policy
The end of the de minimis exemption marks a historic shift in U.S. trade policy with far-reaching consequences for global e-commerce. A practice that enabled the frictionless flow of cheap goods to American consumers is coming to an abrupt close. President Trump’s executive order to impose duties on all imports – even the smallest packages – is driven by concerns over trade fairness, security, and economic strategy. For 3PLs and online sellers, this is a wake-up call: the era of duty-free drop shipments is over, and supply chains must be reconfigured accordingly.
While the new rules pose challenges – from higher costs to increased bureaucracy – they also level the playing field and could spur more responsible, secure trade practices. E-commerce businesses that adapt quickly by leveraging logistics partners, rethinking fulfillment models, and staying compliant will be best positioned to weather the change. In the long run, the closing of the de minimis loophole globally signifies that even small-scale commerce is not exempt from the larger forces of tariff policy and trade enforcement. As August 29 approaches, 3PLs and sellers around the world are bracing for a new chapter in cross-border commerce, one where no package is too small to tariff.
Subscribe to Racklify News for up-to-date Logistics News & Events
Comments
Share this on Social Media: